Before
starting this reading I knew very little about the history of Turkey, specially
the role that women played. According to Deniz Kandiyoti Turkey distinguishes itself
from other Muslim nations due to the emancipation of women. These changes
started from the early 1900’s however, what Kandiyoti is suggesting in her
reading is that “the specifity if the Turkish case with respect to the
emancipation of women can be fully appreciated only through an examination of
the process of her emergence from an empire based on the multi- ethnic millet (national
and religious communities) system to the Anatolia based secular nation state”.
Turkey
went through several changes during and after World War I. These changes
included education and it termination of medrese which was religious education.
Moreover, women were also given the right to vote in 1930 in the local level
and four years later in 1934 they were granted the right to vote at the
national level. In addition polygyny was outlawed and couples (men and women)
were given equal rights to divorce and child custody. This last reform really
interest me because is one of the strongest inequality between men and women in
other Muslim areas such as Iran. As clearly expressed in last week’s discussion,
marriage and divorce and custody works differently for men and women in the Muslin
community. For example, it seems that in Iran women have fewer opportunities to
keep their child custody if they remarry and divorcing their current husband doesn’t
come easy.
Another
topic of interest that grabbed my attention in this reading was the right given
to women to vote. This was really interesting for me because it seems that this
is a struggle that not just Muslim women went through in Turkey, but also a struggle
here in America and probably in other parts of the world. It also proves that social
hierarchy and inequality between men and women exist everywhere in the
world.
No comments:
Post a Comment